Legal scholars argue that existing legal doctrine doesn't just strain under AI — in several places, it's already broken.
Faculty Associate Alicia Solow-Niederman argues that AI "breaks" the law, in that the legal structures governing the technology fail to operate in clear, consistent, and principled ways. "When a leading AI company can contend that data is public enough to scrape—diffusing both privacy and copyright controversies—and then turn around and claim that it’s private enough to keep secret—contesting disclosure or impeding oversight of its training data—something has gone terribly awry," Solow-Niederman writes in the Wharton Accountable AI Forum. You might also like
That's the opening of the original reporting — continue reading at Berkman Klein Center for the rest.